4.8 Article

Portal Inflammation Is Independently Associated With Fibrosis and Metabolic Syndrome in Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 745-753

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.28374

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2014-14-011] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) histology demonstrates variable amounts of portal inflammation, which may be associated with more severe liver disease and fibrosis. We assessed the relationship between portal inflammation, hepatic fibrosis, and the metabolic syndrome in pediatric NAFLD. Children with biopsy-proven NAFLD were eligible for inclusion. Histology was assessed using Kleiner fibrosis stage and the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network system for portal inflammation. Patients were divided by histology into type 1, type 2, and overlap NAFLD. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with fibrosis and portal inflammation. The 430 Caucasian children were divided into 52 with type 1, 95 with type 2, and 283 with overlap NAFLD. Those with type 2 had a more severe metabolic phenotype, with higher body mass index z score (2.0 versus 1.6, P < 0.0001), waist circumference centile (96th versus 90th, P < 0.0001), and triglycerides (84 versus 77 mg/dL, P = 0.01) and lower high-density lipoprotein (46 versus 60 mg/dL, P = 0.004) than those with type 1. Similarly, those with overlap NAFLD had a more severe phenotype. Stage 2-3 fibrosis was present in 69/283 (24%) with overlap NAFLD. Portal inflammation was associated with stage 2-3 fibrosis on multivariable analysis (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.2, odds ratio 5 3.7). Waist circumference centile was associated with portal inflammation (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.4, odds ratio 5 2.0). Conclusion: Portal inflammation is associated with more advanced pediatric NAFLD and features of the metabolic syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据