4.2 Article

ROS functions as an upstream trigger for autophagy to drive hematopoietic stem cell differentiation

期刊

HEMATOLOGY
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 613-618

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10245332.2016.1165446

关键词

Reactive oxygen species; Autophagy; Hematopoietic stem cells; Notch

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31071258, 81272336, 31271526, 81570126]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB512101]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. National Basic Research Program of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: We have recently described a mechanistic action of autophagy on hematopoiesis in which autophagy sustains hematopoietic stem cell multilineage differentiation by direct targeting of intracellular Notch. However, the upstream signal that triggers autophagy to degrade Notch during hematopoiesis remains elusive. Methods: Conditional autophagy-essential gene Atg7 knockout mouse model is used for identifying signals regulating autophagy in the promotion of hematopoiesis. Results: We find here that generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is progressively increased during hematopoietic stem cell differentiation, and inhibition of ROS production was found to attenuate the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. In hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) of wildtype mice, inhibition of ROS production downregulated autophagy activity but upregulated intracellular Notch and its downstream effectors. In contrast, in the HSPCs of autophagy fully defective mice, ROS inhibition did not alter myeloid differentiation, and hematopoietic stem cell differentiation to multi-lineages no longer responded to ROS inhibition. Discussion: The ROS-regulating hematopoiesis is mitochondrial origin, and this action depends on intact autophagy machinery capable of degrading intracellular Notch. Conclusion: ROS functions as an upstream signal in the autophagic promotion of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据