A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation

Emergency Physicians and Personal Narratives Improve the Perceived Effectiveness of COVID‐19 Public Health Recommendations on Social Media: A Randomized Experiment

(2020) Rachel E. Solnick et al.   ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions

(2019) Philipp Schmid et al.   Nature Human Behaviour

Combating Vaccine Hesitancy with Vaccine-Preventable Disease Familiarization: An Interview and Curriculum Intervention for College Students

(2019) Deborah K. Johnson et al.   Vaccines

Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media

(2019) Yuxi Wang et al.   SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE

Using narrative intervention for HPV vaccine behavior change among Khmer mothers and daughters: A pilot RCT to examine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness

(2018) Haeok Lee et al.   APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH

Now or future? Analyzing the effects of message frame and format in motivating Chinese females to get HPV vaccines for their children

(2018) Sixiao Liu et al.   PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING

Effects of Anti- Versus Pro-Vaccine Narratives on Responses by Recipients Varying in Numeracy: A Cross-sectional Survey-Based Experiment

(2017) Wändi Bruine de Bruin et al.   MEDICAL DECISION MAKING

An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers

(2017) Viren Swami et al.   PLoS One

Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence

(2017) John Cook et al.   PLoS One

A randomized trial of maternal influenza immunization decision-making: A test of persuasive messaging models

(2016) Paula M. Frew et al.   Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

Countering antivaccination attitudes

(2015) Zachary Horne et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information

(2015) Brendan Nyhan et al.   VACCINE

Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial

(2014) B. Nyhan et al.   PEDIATRICS

The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions

(2014) Daniel Jolley et al.   PLoS One

Educational interventions to increase HPV vaccination acceptance: A systematic review

(2014) Linda Y. Fu et al.   VACCINE

Medical Conspiracy Theories and Health Behaviors in the United States

(2014) J. Eric Oliver et al.   JAMA Internal Medicine

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2013) David Moher   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science

(2013) Stephan Lewandowsky et al.   PLoS One

Debunking vaccination myths: Strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks.

(2012) Cornelia Betsch et al.   HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY

“Who will take the blame?”: Understanding the reasons why Romanian mothers decline HPV vaccination for their daughters

(2012) Catrinel Craciun et al.   VACCINE

"Herd Immunity": A Rough Guide

(2011) P. Fine et al.   CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES

The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks

(2011) Cornelia Betsch et al.   MEDICAL DECISION MAKING

Conspiracy theories in science

(2010) Ted Goertzel   EMBO REPORTS

Fixing the communications failure

(2010) Dan Kahan   NATURE

What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception.

(2008) John B. F. De Wit et al.   HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY

Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology

(2008) Dan M. Kahan et al.   Nature Nanotechnology

Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review

(2008) Anna Winterbottom et al.   SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE