4.6 Article

A complexity management approach to servitization: the role of digital platforms

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0582

关键词

Complexity; Servitization; Digital; Service operations

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [AKA/5/00.02.40/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to enhance the theoretical foundations of servitization research by establishing a connection with complexity management, identifying complexity-management mechanisms in servitization, and highlighting the role of digital platforms in managing complexity. By using digital platforms, companies can gain new capabilities and opportunities to manage and leverage complexity effectively in the context of servitization.
Purpose This study aims to enhance the theoretical foundations of servitization research by establishing a theoretical connection with complexity management. The authors develop a conceptual framework to describe complexity management mechanisms in servitization and digital platforms' specific role in allowing synergies between complexity reduction and absorption mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach A theory adaptation approach is used. Theory adaptation introduces new perspectives and conceptualization to the domain theory (servitization, with a focus on the role of digital platforms) by informing it with a method theory (complexity management). Findings This study provides four key contributions to the servitization literature: (1) connecting the servitization and complexity-management terminologies, (2) identifying and classifying complexity-management mechanisms in servitization, (3) conceptualizing digital platforms' role in servitization complexity management and (4) recognizing digital platforms' complexity-management synergies. Originality/value This study highlights that by using digital platforms in servitization and understanding the platform approach more thoroughly, companies can gain new capabilities and opportunities to manage and leverage complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据