4.3 Article

Living at the Confluence of Stigmas: PrEP Awareness and Feasibility Among People Who Inject Drugs in Two Predominantly Rural States

期刊

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 3085-3096

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03304-x

关键词

PrEP; People who inject drugs; HIV prevention; Stigma; Healthcare access

资金

  1. Indiana University Addictions Crisis Grand Challenge Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In predominantly rural U.S. states, a majority of people who inject drugs (PWID) were not aware of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention and often confused it with HIV treatment. However, once informed about its intended use for PWID, they tended to have a positive view of PrEP and found the idea of a once-daily pill feasible. Social stigma surrounding drug use continues to be a significant barrier for PWID accessing healthcare and PrEP, often intertwined with anticipated or expressed homophobia. Efforts to implement PrEP interventions among PWID should focus on addressing education and the confluence of stigmas they face in relation to PrEP.
We explored knowledge, beliefs, and acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention with reference to stigma among people who inject drugs (PWID) in two predominately rural U.S. states. We conducted interviews with 65 current or former PWID aged 18 years or older and living in Arizona or Indiana. Most (63%) of the interviewees were not aware of PrEP. They often confused PrEP with HIV treatment, and many believed that PrEP was only for sexual risk or gay sexual risk. Once they understood that PrEP was recommended for PWID, the participants held a positive view of PrEP and felt that a once-daily pill was feasible. Experiences of stigma about drug use remained a crucial barrier to accessing healthcare and PrEP. This was often linked with anticipated or expressed homophobia. PrEP interventions among PWID must focus on education and the confluence of stigmas in which PWID find themselves when considering PrEP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据