Using anchor-based methods to determine the smallest effect size of interest

Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review

(2017) Shanil Ebrahim et al.   PEDIATRICS

Initial elevation bias in subjective reports

(2017) Patrick E. Shrout et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Minimal clinically important difference on the Beck Depression Inventory - II according to the patient's perspective

(2015) K. S. Button et al.   PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE

Measuring Change in Quality of Life: Bias in Prospective and Retrospective Evaluation

(2015) Christine Blome et al.   VALUE IN HEALTH

WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS

(2014) Pim Cuijpers et al.   DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY

Coming to terms with fear

(2014) J. E. LeDoux   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods

(2011) Madeleine T King   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation

(2007) Scott E. Maxwell et al.   Annual Review of Psychology

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

(2007) Robert H. Dworkin et al.   JOURNAL OF PAIN