4.8 Review

Strain engineering of two-dimensional materials for advanced electrocatalysts

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY NANO
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100111

关键词

Mechanoelectrochemistry; Catalysis; Mechanism; Mechanics; Interdisciplinary

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51425302]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2192061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalysis plays a crucial role in the conversion and utilization of clean energy, with two-dimensional materials attracting increasing attention for their excellent properties. Strain engineering is reported to modify the electronic structure of nanomaterials, including 2D materials, affecting their catalytic activity. This review summarizes the impact of strain engineering on the electrocatalytic properties of 2D materials.
Electrocatalysis is of great significance for the conversion and utilization of clean energy industrially. Along with the pursuing of highly efficiency and selectivity, an exploded number of catalysts have been designed, among which two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted growing attention due to their outstanding physical and chemical properties. Recently, growing attention has been paid to strain engineering as it was reported to be able to modify the electronic structure, and thus, alter the catalytic activity of nanomaterials, including the 2D family; however, a summary of strain engineering effect of 2D materials on their electrocatalytic properties lacks to our knowledge. As such, we provide this review by discussing three aspects, including the strain engineering method, the influence of strain on the electronic structure of 2D materials, and its use and mechanism in electrocatalysis. This timely review aims to clarify the current development of this topic so as to promote the concern on such strained catalysts and bring the mechano-electrochemical concept into the view of this traditional field. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据