4.8 Article

Hydrolytic liquefaction of hydrolysis lignin for the preparation of bio-based rigid polyurethane foam

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 2385-2398

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5gc02876k

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC/FPInnovations Industrial Research Chair Program in Forest Biorefinery
  2. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence (ORF-RE) from the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  3. FPInnovations
  4. Arclin Canada
  5. BioIndustrial Innovation Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrolysis lignin (HL) was liquefied to a low average molecular weight (M-w) intermediate by employing a 50/50 (v/v) water-ethanol mixture. The effects of process parameters including the reaction temperature, the reaction time and the HL concentration were investigated and the liquefied hydrolysis lignin (LHL) products obtained were characterized by GPC, FTIR and H-1 NMR. The best operating conditions appeared to be at 250 degrees C, 1 h with 20% (w/v) HL concentration, leading to similar to 70 wt% yield of LHL (M-w similar to 1000 g mol(-1) and OHTotal similar to 442 mg KOH g(-1)). The solid form LHL was derivatized into liquid polyols via oxypropylation with 50-70 wt% bio-content, which was subsequently utilized for the preparation of bio-based rigid polyurethane (BRPU) foams. All the foams were characterized in terms of their physical, mechanical and thermal properties & morphology. BRPU foams exhibit superior compression modulus and strengths to a reference foam prepared from commercial sucrose polyols provided by Huntsman Co. At a fixed formulation, i. e., a fixed percentage of physical blowing agent, BRPU foams showed the following sequence in terms of their compression modulus: sucrose polyol reference foam (2695.0 kPa) < LHL50PO50 (9202.0 kPa) < LHL60PO40 (19 847.0 kPa) < LHL70PO30 (21 288.0 kPa). All BRPU foams were thermally stable up to approximately 200 degrees C and thermal conductivity was low (0.030 +/- 0.001 W m(-1) K-1), making them suitable candidates for insulation material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据