4.7 Article

Clinical Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Adults Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative

期刊

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16901

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. NCATS [U24 TR002306]
  3. Stony Brook University [U24TR002306]
  4. Oklahoma Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center [U54GM104938]
  5. West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University [U54GM104942]
  6. Mississippi Center for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Mississippi Medical Center [U54GM115428]
  7. Great Plains IDeA-Clinical AMP
  8. Translational Research, University of Nebraska Medical Center [U54GM115458]
  9. Northern New England Clinical AMP
  10. Translational Research) Network, Maine Medical Center [U54GM115516]
  11. Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University Health Sciences [UL1TR001420]
  12. Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Northwestern University [UL1TR001422]
  13. Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati [UL1TR001425]
  14. Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston [UL1TR001439]
  15. South Carolina Clinical AMP
  16. Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina [UL1TR001450]
  17. UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester [UL1TR001453]
  18. Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California [UL1TR001855]
  19. Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Cente [UL1TR001873]
  20. Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's National, GeorgeWashington Children's Research Institute [UL1TR001876]
  21. Appalachian Translational Research Network, University of Kentucky [UL1TR001998]
  22. University of Rochester Clinical AMP
  23. Translational Science Institute [UL1TR001998]
  24. University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science [UL1TR002003]
  25. Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR002014]
  26. Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor [UL1TR002240]
  27. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center [UL1TR002243]
  28. Institute of Translational Health Sciences, University ofWashington [UL1TR002319]
  29. Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis [UL1TR002345]
  30. Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health AMP
  31. Science University [UL1TR002369]
  32. Wisconsin Network For Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison [UL1TR002373]
  33. Institute for Translational Medicine, Rush University Medical Center [UL1TR002389]
  34. Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Chicago [UL1TR002389]
  35. North Carolina Translational and Clinical Science Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [UL1TR002489]
  36. Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota [UL1TR002494]
  37. Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute and Children's Hospital Colorado [UL1TR002535]
  38. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa [UL1TR002537, UL1TR002535 03S2]
  39. Uhealth Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah [UL1TR002538]
  40. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts Medical Center [UL1TR002544]
  41. Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University [UL1TR002553]
  42. C. Kenneth and DianneWright Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Virginia Commonwealth University [UL1TR002649]
  43. Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Ohio State University [UL1TR002733]
  44. University of Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR002736]
  45. iTHRIVL Integrated Translational health Research Institute of Virginia, University of Virginia [UL1TR003015]
  46. iTHRIVL Integrated Translational health Research Institute of Virginia, Carilion Clinic [UL1TR003015]
  47. Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham [UL1TR003096]
  48. Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University [UL1TR003098]
  49. Consortium of Rural States, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences [UL1TR003107]
  50. Delaware CTR ACCEL Program, Nemours [U54GM104941]
  51. Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado, Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus [UL1TR002535]
  52. Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic Rochester [UL1TR002377]
  53. Institute for Translational Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center [UL1TR002389]
  54. Institute for Translational Medicine, Advocate Health Care Network [UL1TR002389]
  55. Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rockefeller University [UL1TR001866]
  56. Scripps Research Translational Institute, The Scripps Research Institute [UL1TR002550]
  57. Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio [UL1TR002645]
  58. Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston [UL1TR003167]
  59. Institute for Translational Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem [UL1TR002389]
  60. Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale New Haven Hospital [UL1TR001863]
  61. Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Emory University [UL1TR002378]
  62. Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University [UL1TR002384]
  63. Institute for Clinical and Translational Research at Einstein and Montefiore, Montefiore Medical Center [UL1TR002556]
  64. Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin [UL1TR001436]
  65. University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center [UL1TR001449]
  66. Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's National, GeorgeWashington University [UL1TR001876]
  67. Spectrum: The Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Research and Education, Stanford University [UL1TR003142]
  68. Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Regenstrief Institute [UL1TR002529]
  69. Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center [UL1TR001425]
  70. Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston University Medical Campus [UL1TR001430]
  71. Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center, University Medical Center New Orleans [U54GM104940]
  72. Clinical and Translational Science Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo [UL1TR001412]
  73. Wisconsin Network For Health Research, Aurora Health Care [UL1TR002373]
  74. Advance Clinical Translational Research, Brown University [U54GM115677]
  75. New Jersey Alliance for Clinical and Translational Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey [UL1TR003017]
  76. Institute for Translational Medicine, Loyola University Chicago [UL1TR002389]
  77. Langone Health's Clinical and Translational Science Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine [UL1TR001445]
  78. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia [UL1TR001878]
  79. Frontiers: University of Kansas Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center [UL1TR002366]
  80. Harvard Catalyst, Massachusetts General Brigham [UL1TR002541]
  81. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-018455]
  82. ConduITS Institute for Translational Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [UL1TR001433]
  83. Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center, Ochsner Medical Center [U54GM104940]
  84. University of California, Irvine Institute for Clinical and Translational Science [UL1TR001414]
  85. Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego [UL1TR001442]
  86. UCDavis Health Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California, Davis [UL1TR001860]
  87. University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR001872]
  88. UCLA Clinical Translational Science Institute [UL1TR001881]
  89. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-018455] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated COVID-19 severity and risk factors in over 1.9 million US adults, finding that machine learning models can accurately predict clinical severity. It also observed a decrease in COVID-19 mortality over time in 2020 and identified associations between patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities with higher clinical severity.
IMPORTANCE The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is a centralized, harmonized, high-granularity electronic health record repository that is the largest, most representative COVID-19 cohort to date. This multicenter data set can support robust evidence-based development of predictive and diagnostic tools and inform clinical care and policy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate COVID-19 severity and risk factors over time and assess the use of machine learning to predict clinical severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a retrospective cohort study of 1 926 526 US adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection (polymerase chain reaction >99% or antigen <1%) and adult patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection who served as controls from 34 medical centers nationwide between January 1, 2020, and December 7, 2020, patients were stratified using a World Health Organization COVID-19 severity scale and demographic characteristics. Differences between groups over time were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Random forest and XGBoost models were used to predict severe clinical course (death, discharge to hospice, invasive ventilatory support, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient demographic characteristics and COVID-19 severity using the World Health Organization COVID-19 severity scale and differences between groups over time using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The cohort included 174 568 adults who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (mean [SD] age, 44.4 [18.6] years; 53.2% female) and 1 133 848 adult controls who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (mean [SD] age, 49.5 [19.2] years; 57.1% female). Of the 174 568 adults with SARS-CoV-2, 32 472 (18.6%) were hospitalized, and 6565 (20.2%) of those had a severe clinical course (invasive ventilatory support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, death, or discharge to hospice). Of the hospitalized patients, mortality was 11.6% overall and decreased from 16.4% in March to April 2020 to 8.6% in September to October 2020 (P = .002 for monthly trend). Using 64 inputs available on the first hospital day, this study predicted a severe clinical course using random forest and XGBoost models (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.87 for both) that were stable over time. The factor most strongly associated with clinical severity was pH; this result was consistent across machine learning methods. In a separate multivariable logistic regression model built for inference, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 per year; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04), male sex (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.51-1.69), liver disease (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34), dementia (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41), African American (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) and Asian (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.57) race, and obesity (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.27-1.46) were independently associated with higher clinical severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that COVID-19 mortality decreased over time during 2020 and that patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities were associated with higher clinical severity. The machine learning models accurately predicted ultimate clinical severity using commonly collected clinical data from the first 24 hours of a hospital admission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据