Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JAMA Network Open
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages e2110703
出版商
American Medical Association (AMA)
发表日期
2021-05-21
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Super Learner for Survival Data Prediction
- (2020) Marzieh K. Golmakani et al. International Journal of Biostatistics
- Risk Of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Increases With Combinations Of Antithrombotic Agents And Patient Age
- (2019) Neena S. Abraham et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review
- (2019) Dennis Shung et al. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
- Comparison of machine learning algorithms for clinical event prediction (risk of coronary heart disease)
- (2019) Juan-Jose Beunza et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
- (2019) Evangelia Christodoulou et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- HAS-BLED Scores Underestimate Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Among Those With H. pylori
- (2019) Adam Faye et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Gastrointestinal Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Large Population-Based Study
- (2017) Neena S. Abraham et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Evaluation of the HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and ORBIT Bleeding Risk Scores in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin
- (2016) Keitaro Senoo et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Clinical Impact of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
- (2015) K. C. Koskinas et al. Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions
- Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study
- (2015) N. S. Abraham et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study
- (2015) N. S. Abraham et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROC operating point selection for classification of imbalanced data with application to computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography
- (2013) Bowen Song et al. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
- Scores to Predict Major Bleeding Risk During Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: A Prospective Validation Study
- (2012) Jacques Donzé et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Predictive Value of the HAS-BLED and ATRIA Bleeding Scores for the Risk of Serious Bleeding in a “Real-World” Population With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy
- (2012) Vanessa Roldán et al. CHEST
- OC-015 Prognostic indicators for short and long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): a multi-centre (CERT-n) study
- (2012) J Geraghty et al. GUT
- Performance of the HEMORR2HAGES, ATRIA, and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk–Prediction Scores in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Anticoagulation
- (2012) Stavros Apostolakis et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- A Novel User-Friendly Score (HAS-BLED) To Assess 1-Year Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
- (2010) Ron Pisters et al. CHEST
- Risk of bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with different combinations of aspirin, clopidogrel, and vitamin K antagonists in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data
- (2009) Rikke Sørensen et al. LANCET
- Random survival forests
- (2008) Hemant Ishwaran et al. Annals of Applied Statistics
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started