4.7 Article

Stress-release design for high-capacity and long-time lifespan aqueous zinc-ion batteries

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100799

关键词

Yolk-shell architecture; Stress management; Mn-based cathode; Zn-ion battery; Long cycling stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874110, 51604089]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601431, 2018T110308]
  3. Heilongjiang Provincial Post-doctoral Science Foundation [LBH-Z16056, LBH-TZ1707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical porous Mn2O3 yolk-shell microspheres were designed to effectively release internal stresses and achieve high reversible capacity and long cycle life, offering a new direction for developing structurally stable electrodes for practical energy applications.
Mn-based cathodes are promising candidates for aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) owing to the merits of low toxicity, high energy density, and safety. However, due to the strong electrostatic resistance of Zn2+, ZIBs usually suffer from huge mechanical stress during cycling and result in serious volume fluctuation and structural instability. Correspondingly, it is still significant to explore an effective stress-release strategy for achieving a long-time cycle lifespan with high available capacity. Herein, we report an urchin-like hierarchical porous Mn2O3 yolk-shell microspheres (HP-Mn2O3-YSMSs). As a proof of concept, the designed hierarchical porous yolk-shell architecture effectively releases the internal stresses from both radial and tangential directions via the internal void space and porous shell. Specifically, the HP-Mn2O3-YSMSs manifest high reversible capacity (311 mAh/g at 0.1 A/g) and long cycle life (81.3% retention at 2.0 A/g after 4000 cycles). This effective stress-release design opens a new direction for the development of the structural stable electrodes for practical energy applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据