4.8 Article

Exosome-loaded extracellular matrix-mimic hydrogel with anti-inflammatory property Facilitates/promotes growth plate injury repair

期刊

BIOACTIVE MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 145-158

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.010

关键词

Extracellular matrix-mimic hydrogel; Exosomes; Immunomodulatory; Extracellular matrix deposition; Growth plate injury repair

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515011369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growth plate cartilage has limited self-repair ability, leading to poor bone bridge formation and limb growth defects in children. The researchers developed an exosome-derived hydrogel that directly supplements extracellular matrix and inhibits inflammation to promote cartilage repair. The hydrogel significantly enhanced extracellular matrix synthesis and facilitated growth plate injury repair through ECM remodeling.
Growth plate cartilage has limited self-repair ability, leading to poor bone bridge formation post-injury and ultimately limb growth defects in children. The current corrective surgeries are highly invasive, and outcomes can be unpredictable. Following growth plate injury, the direct loss of extracellular matrix (ECM) coupled with further ECM depletion due to the inhibitory effects of inflammation on the cartilage matrix protein greatly hinder chondrocyte regeneration. We designed an exosome (Exo) derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) loaded ECM-mimic hydrogel to promote cartilage repair by directly supplementing ECM and antiinflammatory properties. Aldehyde-functionalized chondroitin sulfate (OCS) was introduced into gelatin methacryloyl (GM) to form GMOCS hydrogel. Our results uncovered that GMOCS hydrogel could significantly promote the synthesis of ECM due to the doping of OCS. In addition, the GMOCS-Exos hydrogel could further promote the anabolism of chondrocytes by inhibiting inflammation and ultimately promote growth plate injury repair through ECM remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据