4.4 Review

Determinants of parathyroid hormone response to vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 114, 期 9, 页码 1360-1374

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515003189

关键词

Cholecalciferol; Vitamin D; Parathyroid hormone; Meta-analyses; Randomised controlled trials

资金

  1. ERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review aimed to assess the determinants of the parathyroid hormone (PTH) level response to vitamin D supplementation. We searched Medline, Google Scholar and the reference lists of previous reviews. All randomised controlled trials (RCT) on vitamin D supplementation that involved apparently healthy human subjects with a report of PTH were selected. Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate. Results are summarised as mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals. Quality assessment, subgroup analysis, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis were carried out. Thirty-three vitamin D supplementation RCT were included. Vitamin D supplementation significantly raised circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) with significant heterogeneity among studies with a pooled mean difference (PMD) of 15.5 ng/ml (test for heterogeneity: P < 0.01 and I-2 = 97.3%) Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced PTH level with PMD of -8.0 pg/ml, with significant heterogeneity ((test for heterogeneity: P < 0.01) and the I-2 value was 97.3%) In the subgroup analyses, the optimum treatment effect for PTH was observed with Ca doses of 600-1200 mg/d (-22.8 pg/ml), after the duration of a >12-month trial (-18.6 pg/ml), with low baseline 25(OH) D concentration of < 20 ng/ml (-16.0 pg/ml) and in those who were overweight and obese (-18.1 pg/ml) Despite the present meta-analysis being hindered by some limitations, it provided some interesting evidence, suggesting that suppression of PTH level needs higher vitamin D intake (75 mu g/d) than the current recommendations and longer durations (12 months), which should be taken into account for nutritional recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据