4.5 Article

The Arthropod Fauna of Oak (Quercus spp., Fagaceae) Canopies in Norway

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d13070332

关键词

Quercus; oak; canopy; fogging; new species; inventory; Norway

资金

  1. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre [70184219, 70184228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study documented the invertebrate fauna collected from oak canopies in Norway, identifying a large number of new species. The research highlights the importance of oak trees as habitats and the efficiency of canopy fogging technique in discovering hidden fauna. The low number of red listed species found also indicates the need for further study of Norwegian insect fauna.
(1) We document the invertebrate fauna collected from 24 oak canopies in east and west Norway as a contribution to the Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre's 'The Norwegian Taxonomy Initiative'. (2) A snap-shot inventory of the canopies was recorded by means of emitting a mist of natural pyrethrum into the canopies at night using a petrol-driven fogger and collecting the specimens in butterfly nets spread on the ground under the canopy. (3) Almost the entire catch of more than 6800 specimens was identified to 722 species. Out of 92 species new to the Norwegian fauna, 21 were new to science and, additionally, 15 were new to the Nordic fauna. Diptera alone constituted nearly half of the species represented, with 61 new records (18 new species). Additionally, 24 Hymenoptera (one new species), six oribatid mites (two new species) and one Thysanoptera were new to the Norwegian fauna. (4) Our study emphasizes the importance of the oak tree as a habitat both for a specific fauna and occasional visitors, and it demonstrates that the canopy fogging technique is an efficient way to find the 'hidden fauna' of Norwegian forests. The low number of red listed species found reflects how poor the Norwegian insect fauna is still studied. Moreover, the implication of the IUCN red list criteria for newly described or newly observed species is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据