4.7 Review

Tritordeum: Creating a New Crop Species-The Successful Use of Plant Genetic Resources

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10051029

关键词

tritordeum; Hordeum chilense; pre-breeding; genetic resources

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [AGL2017-85368-P]
  2. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the main advances in breeding and quality improvement of hexaploid tritordeum, emphasizing the importance of utilizing plant genetic resources effectively for the development of new crops. The success of tritordeum demonstrates the significance of adequate commercialization strategies and demonstrative experiences in developing new products for consumers.
Hexaploid tritordeum is the amphiploid derived from the cross between the wild barley Hordeum chilense and durum wheat. This paper reviews the main advances and achievements in the last two decades that led to the successful development of tritordeum as a new crop. In particular, we summarize the progress in breeding for agronomic performance, including the potential of tritordeum as a genetic bridge for wheat breeding; the impact of molecular markers in genetic studies and breeding; and the progress in quality and development of innovative food products. The success of tritordeum as a crop shows the importance of the effective utilization of plant genetic resources for the development of new innovative products for agriculture and industry. Considering that wild plant genetic resources have made possible the development of this new crop, the huge potential of more accessible resources, such as landraces conserved in gene banks, goes beyond being sources of resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, the positive result of tritordeum also shows the importance of adequate commercialization strategies and demonstrative experiences aimed to integrate the whole food chain, from producers to end-point sellers, in order to develop new products for consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据