4.5 Article

Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Monocentric Observational Study

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11070890

关键词

influenza vaccine; hesitancy; multiple sclerosis; observational study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study results show that most MS patients accepted flu vaccination, emphasizing the importance of education and communication campaigns in improving vaccination rates. While the majority of patients were vaccinated, there is still room for improvement in increasing vaccination rates.
Background. The so-called vaccine hesitancy still represents a common phenomenon that undermines the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. In 2020, the Italian Medicines Agency recommended to bring forward the flu vaccination campaign, whose importance was also emphasized for patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We aimed to assess vaccination behavior in patients with MS to prepare for the upcoming SARS-CoV-2 vaccination challenge. Methods. This is an observational study carried out in one MS clinical Centre that enrolled all MS patients who were eligible for any of the flu vaccines recommended by the Italian medicines Agency. Results. 194 patients were enrolled. Patients' mean age was 43.9 years and 66% were female. Comorbidities, mainly represented by non-autoimmune diseases, were identified in 52% of patients. Almost all patients were receiving a DMT during the study period, mainly dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab, teriflunomide, and interferon. Out of 194 patients, 58.2% accepted to be vaccinated. No statistically significant differences were found, except for the use of natalizumab, which was higher among vaccinated patients. Conclusion. The results of our study emphasize the importance of education and communication campaigns addressed both to healthcare providers and patients with MS, especially considering that MS patients are currently receiving COVID-19 vaccinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据