4.6 Review

Management of Sjogren's Syndrome: Present Issues and Future Perspectives

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.676885

关键词

Sjogren's syndrome; classification criteria; outcome measures; autoantibodies; biomarkers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the new biotechnological agents offering new possibilities for treating pSS, completed therapeutic trials have not yielded satisfactory results. Issues such as the extreme variability of patient phenotypes and the indolent nature of the disease leading to irreversible features in some patients have been identified as reasons for the poor outcomes. Advances in disease biomarker research are also discussed as potential solutions to improve patient selection and early diagnosis.
In view of the new possibilities for the treatment of primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) given by the availability of new biotechnological agents targeting the various molecular and cellular actors of the pathological process of the disease, classification criteria aimed at selecting patients to be enrolled in therapeutic trials, and validated outcome measures to be used as response criteria to these new therapies, have been developed and validated in the last decades. Unfortunately, the therapeutic trials so far completed with these new treatments have yielded unsatisfactory or only partially positive results. The main issues that have been evoked to justify the poor results of the new therapeutic attempts are: (i) the extreme variability of the disease phenotypes of the patients enrolled in the trials, which are dependent on different underlying patterns of biological mechanisms, (ii) the fact that the disease has a long indolent course, and that most of the enrolled patients might already have irreversible clinical features. The advances in the research of new disease biomarkers that can better distinguish the different clinical phenotypes of patients and diagnose the disease in an earlier phase are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据