4.8 Article

Herbivory and nutrient limitation protect warming tundra from lowland species' invasion and diversity loss

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 245-255

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13397

关键词

abiotic resistance; biotic resistance; colimitation; community-weighted mean traits; establishment limitation; grazing; multiple interacting global changes; range shift

资金

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  2. Academy of Finland [253385]
  3. Nordic Centre of Excellence - Tundra
  4. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning [2006-1539]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2015-00498]
  6. Vinnova [2015-00498] Funding Source: Vinnova
  7. Swedish Research Council [2015-00498] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herbivory and nutrient limitation can increase the resistance of temperature-limited systems to invasions under climate warming. We imported seeds of lowland species to tundra under factorial treatments of warming, fertilization, herbivore exclusion and biomass removal. We show that warming alone had little impact on lowland species, while exclusion of native herbivores and relaxation of nutrient limitation greatly benefitted them. In contrast, warming alone benefitted resident tundra species and increased species richness; however, these were canceled by negative effects of herbivore exclusion and fertilization. Dominance of lowland species was associated with low cover of tundra species and resulted in decreased species richness. Our results highlight the critical role of biotic and abiotic filters unrelated to temperature in protecting tundra under warmer climate. While scarcity of soil nutrients and native herbivores act as important agents of resistance to invasions by lowland species, they concurrently promote overall species coexistence. However, when these biotic and abiotic resistances are relaxed, invasion of lowland species can lead to decreased abundance of resident tundra species and diminished diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据