4.7 Article

Dynamics of water conveying SWCNT nanoparticles and swimming microorganisms over a Riga plate subject to heat source/sink

期刊

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 2418-2429

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.104

关键词

Riga plate; Carbon nanotubes; Uniform heat source/sink; Thermophoretic particle deposition; Bioconvection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the application of Electromagnetohydrodynamic (EMHD) in fluidic networks and investigates the interaction between SWCNT/water flow and microorganisms on a Riga plate using numerical methods. The results show that increasing slip effects decrease velocity, temperature, and concentration curves, while increasing solid volume fraction increases temperature, concentration, and motile microorganism density.
Electromagnetohydrodynamic (EMHD) is very important because of its numerous advantages such as flow control in fluidics networks, fluid pumping, thermal reactors, mixing, fluid stirring, liquid chromatography, and micro coolers. Based on the above applications in this article discussed the electromagnetic forces on the SWCNT/water flow with microorganisms over a Riga plate subject to slip effects. In addition, the uniform heat source/sink effect is used in the energy equation, as well as the thermophoretic effect in the concentration equation. The governing nonlinear system of partial differential equations (PDEs) was reduced to ordinary differential equations (ODEs) by applying the appropriate similarity variables. Hence, Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF-45) method was applied to numerically solve the extremely nonlinear system. Based on the analysis of the results, it is worth concluding that raising the role of slip effects lowers the velocity, temperature, and concentration curves, while increasing the solid volume fraction increases the temperature, concentration, and motile microorganism density. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据