4.7 Review

Future-Proofing EU Legislation for Genome-Edited Plants: Dutch Stakeholders' Views on Possible Ways Forward

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11071331

关键词

CRISPR-Cas; genome editing; GMO regulation; plant breeding

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality of the Netherlands [BO-43-112-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome editing is considered a genetic modification technique in Europe, subjecting plants obtained by this method to GMO legislation. Stakeholders in the Dutch plant breeding sector prefer future-proof legislation that also encompasses products of novel technologies. Discussions focus on potential adaptations to current legislation to align with regulation of genome edited plants in non-EU countries.
Genome editing is an emerging, new breeding technology with numerous potential applications in plant breeding. In Europe, genome editing is regarded, in legal terms, as a genetic modification technique, hence plants obtained using these methods fall under the legislation for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Despite the opportunities that genome editing brings to the plant sector, it also poses challenges to the regulatory system. For example, the enforcement of labelling and traceability requirements for GM foods and feeds may be impossible for small genome edits that are indistinguishable from natural mutations. In order to discuss potential adaptations of EU legislation with stakeholders from the Dutch plant breeding sector, five different scenarios of future regulation of plants obtained by means of genome editing were elaborated. These scenarios were discussed in depth, along with the potential applications of genome editing in plant breeding, as well as challenges and opportunities. Stakeholders particularly indicated their preference for new, future-proof legislation in the long term, which will also include products of novel technologies. Finally, we discuss potential short-term amendments to current legislation, including the exemption of certain small mutations, that would make it align with regulation of genome edited plants in non-EU countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Chemistry, Organic

Bacterial patterning controlled by light exposure

Willem A. Velema, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Wiktor Szymanski, Arnold J. M. Driessen, Ben L. Feringa

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY (2015)

Article Chemistry, Multidisciplinary

Controlling the activity of quorum sensing autoinducers with light

J. P. Van der Berg, W. A. Velema, W. Szymanski, A. J. M. Driessen, B. L. Feringa

CHEMICAL SCIENCE (2015)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Orthogonal Control of Antibacterial Activity with Light

Willem A. Velema, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Wiktor Szymanski, Arnold J. M. Driessen, Ben L. Feringa

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY (2014)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

In vitro synthesis and oligomerization of the mechanosensitive channel of large conductance, MscL, into a functional ion channel

Claire E. Price, Armagan Kocer, Stefan Kol, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Arnold J. M. Driessen

FEBS LETTERS (2011)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Subunit a of the F1F0 ATP Synthase Requires YidC and SecYEG for Membrane Insertion

Stefan Kol, Wiktor Majczak, Rene Heerlien, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Nico Nouwen, Arnold J. M. Driessen

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (2009)

Article Chemistry, Multidisciplinary

Optical control of antibacterial activity

Willem A. Velema, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Mickel J. Hansen, Wiktor Szymanski, Arnold J. M. Driessen, Ben L. Feringa

NATURE CHEMISTRY (2013)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Binding of the Lactococcal Drug Dependent Transcriptional Regulator LmrR to Its Ligands and Responsive Promoter Regions

Jan Pieter van der Berg, Pramod Kumar Madoori, Amalina Ghaisani Komarudin, Andy-Mark Thunnissen, Arnold J. M. Driessen

PLOS ONE (2015)

Article Reproductive Biology

Regulation and safety considerations of somatic cell nuclear transfer-cloned farm animals and their offspring used for food production

Jan Pieter van der Berg, Gijs A. Kleter, Esther J. Kok

THERIOGENOLOGY (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

Application of the Safe-by-Design Concept in Crop Breeding Innovation

Jan Pieter van der Berg, Gijs A. Kleter, Evy Battaglia, Lianne M. S. Bouwman, Esther J. Kok

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2020)

Review Food Science & Technology

Alternative proteins for meat and dairy replacers: Food safety and future trends

J. L. Banach, J. P. van der Berg, G. Kleter, H. van Bokhorst-van de Veen, S. Bastiaan-Net, L. Pouvreau, E. D. van Asselt

Summary: This review provides an analysis of the food safety hazards, industry trends, and processing methods associated with alternative proteins for meat and dairy products in the European Union market. Understanding the effects of processing and safety of alternative proteins is crucial for ensuring food safety and assessing risks to consumers, though current data is limited.

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION (2022)

Review Biochemical Research Methods

Comparative safety assessment of genetically modified crops: focus on equivalence with reference varieties could contribute to more efficient and effective field trials

Gijs A. Kleter, Hilko van der Voet, Jasper Engel, Jan-Pieter van der Berg

Summary: The initial compositional analysis of plants is crucial in the internationally harmonized approach to assess the safety of genetically modified plants. The current EFSA guidance suggests two types of comparison methods: difference tests with a conventional comparator or control, and equivalence tests with a collection of commercial reference varieties. Previous experience shows that statistically significant differences between the test and control can often be ignored if they fall within the equivalence limits of reference varieties with a presumed safe history. Thus, the inclusion of a conventional counterpart and the performance of difference testing can be omitted in favor of including safety testing regimes into other variety trials.

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH (2023)

Review Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants

Mark H. J. Sturme, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Lianne M. S. Bouwman, Adinda De Schrijver, Ruud A. de Maagd, Gijs A. Kleter, Evy Battaglia-de Wilde

Summary: CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing allows for precise and targeted genetic modification of plants, but unintended off-target edits can increase risks for gene-edited food crops. Most observed off-target changes are small insertions, deletions, or nucleotide substitutions, with large deletions being rare. Off-target sites have few mismatches with the target sequence and are mainly located in protein-coding regions, often in target gene homologues. Off-target edits are primarily detected through biased analysis of predicted off-target sites. CRISPR-Cas-edited plants show lower off-target mutation frequencies compared to conventionally bred plants. This review can assist in discussing the relevance of evaluating off-target modifications for risk assessment of CRISPR-Cas-edited plants.

ACS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2022)

Review Agronomy

Developments in genetic modification of cattle and implications for regulation, safety and traceability

Jan Pieter van der Berg, Gijs A. Kleter, Evy Battaglia, Martien A. M. Groenen, Esther J. Kok

FRONTIERS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (2020)

暂无数据