4.4 Article

Role of international normalized ratio in nonpulmonary sepsis screening: An observational study

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
卷 9, 期 25, 页码 7405-7416

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i25.7405

关键词

Sepsis; Coagulopathy; International normalized ratio; Screening tool; Quick Sequential Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment

资金

  1. Joint Scientific Research Project of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission and Health Commission [2019MSXM019, 2021MSXM033]
  2. Natural Science Project of Science and Technology Department of Tibet Autonomous Region [XZ2019ZR-ZY55(Z)]
  3. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation Project [cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0124]
  4. COVID-19 Emergency Projects of Chongqing Medical University [X1-2611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that INR is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of nonpulmonary infectious sepsis in adults, providing superior diagnostic efficacy compared to other clinical indicators. When INR levels exceed 1.22, high vigilance is required for adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis.
BACKGROUND Currently, there is a lack of sepsis screening tools that can be widely used worldwide. Pulmonary sepsis can be of sufficient concern to physicians due to their noticeable symptoms, which usually rely less on screening tools. AIM To investigate the efficiency of the international normalized ratio (INR) for the early rapid recognition of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. METHODS This is a prospective observational study. A total of 108 sepsis patients and 106 nonsepsis patients were enrolled according to relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Commonly used clinical indicators, such as white blood cell, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), platelets (PLT), prothrombin time, INR, activated partial thromboplastin time, and quick Sequential Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores were recorded within 24 h after admission. The diagnostic performances of these clinical indicators were analyzed and compared through multivariate logistic regression analysis, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS The INR value of the sepsis group was significantly higher than that of the nonsepsis group. INR has superior diagnostic efficacy for sepsis, with an area under the curve value of 0.918, when those preexisting diseases which significantly affect coagulation function were excluded. The diagnostic efficacy of the INR was more significant than that of NLCR, PLT, and qSOFA (P < 0.05). Moreover, INR levels of 1.17, 1.20, and 1.22 could be used to categorize the relative risk of nonpulmonary infections sepsis into three categories: low, medium and high risk, respectively. CONCLUSION The INR is a promising and easily available biomarker for diagnosis, and it can be used as one of the indicators for early screening of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. When its value is higher than the optimal cutoff value (1.22), high vigilance is required for adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据