4.5 Article

Economic costs of biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems in Russia

期刊

NEOBIOTA
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 103-130

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58529

关键词

Direct and indirect losses; insects; InvaCost; invasive species; pathogens; Russian Federation; weeds

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-14-CE02-0021]
  2. BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative
  3. AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology
  4. BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-04-01029-A]
  6. Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS [0287-2021-0011]
  7. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [FEFE-2020-0014]
  8. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  9. BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project Alien Scenarios [BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized a global database to quantify the economic costs of biological invasions in Russia, revealing significant impacts on agriculture and forestry sectors. Majority of costs were based on predictions or extrapolations, with only a small portion empirically observed.
Terrestrial ecosystems, owing to the presence of key socio-economic sectors such as agriculture and forestry, may be particularly economically affected by biological invasions. The present study uses a subset of the recently developed database of global economic costs of biological invasions (InvaCost) to quantify the monetary costs of biological invasions in Russia, the largest country in the world that spans two continents. From 2007 up to 2019, invasions costed the Russian economy at least US$ 51.52 billion (RUB 1.38 trillion, n = 94 cost entries), with the vast majority of these costs based on predictions or extrapolations (US$ 50.86 billion; n = 87) and, therefore, not empirically observed. Most cost entries exhibited low geographic resolution, being split between European and Asian parts of Russia (US$ 44.17 billion; n = 72). Just US$ 7.35 billion (n = 22) was attributed to the European part solely and none to the Asian part. Invasion costs were documented for 72 species and particularly insects (37 species). The empirically-observed costs, summing up to US$ 660 million (n = 7), were reported only for four species: two insects Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire and Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) and two plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. The vast majority of economic costs were related to resource damages and economic losses, with very little reported expenditures on managing invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. In turn, agriculture (US$ 37.42 billion; n = 68) and forestry (US$ 14.0 billion; n = 20) were the most impacted sectors. Overall, we report burgeoning economic costs of invasions in Russia and identify major knowledge gaps, for example, concerning specific habitat types (i.e. aquatic) and management expenditures, as well as for numerous known invasive taxa with no reported economic costs (i.e. vertebrates). Given this massive, largely underestimated economic burden of invasions in Russia, our work is a call for improved reporting of costs nationally and internationally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据