4.6 Article

Improved 1D inversions for sea ice thickness and conductivity from electromagnetic induction data: Inclusion of nonlinearities caused by passive bucking

期刊

GEOPHYSICS
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 WA45-WA58

出版社

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2015-0130.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. SNIC through the Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science (UPPMAX, Uppsala, Sweden) [snic2014-1-243]
  2. POLMAR graduate school
  3. Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fur Polar- und Meeresforschung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The porosity of sea ice is a fundamental physical parameter that governs the mechanical strength of sea ice and the mobility of gases and nutrients for biological processes and biogeochemical cycles in the sea ice layer. However, little is known about the spatial distribution of the sea ice porosity and its variability between different sea ice types; an efficient and nondestructive method to measure this property is currently missing. Sea ice porosity is linked to the bulk electrical conductivity of sea ice, a parameter routinely used to discriminate between sea ice and seawater by electromagnetic (EM) induction sensors. Here, we have evaluated the prospect of porosity retrieval of sea ice by means of bulk conductivity estimates using 1D multi-frequency EM inversion schemes. We have focused on two inversion algorithms, a smoothness-constrained inversion and a Marquardt-Levenberg inversion, which we modified for the nonlinear signal bias caused by a passive bucking coil operated in such a highly conductive environment. Using synthetic modeling studies, 1D inversion algorithms and multiple frequencies, we found that we can resolve the sea ice conductivity within +/- 0.01 S/m. Using standard assumptions for the conductivity-porosity relation of sea ice, we were able to estimate porosity with an uncertainty of +/- 1.2%, which enables efficient and nondestructive surveys of the internal state of the sea ice cover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据