4.6 Article

Cytolytic Activity of CAR T Cells and Maintenance of Their CD4+Subset Is Critical for Optimal Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Solid Tumor Models

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174301

关键词

solid tumor; chimeric antigen receptor (CAR); immunotherapy; cell therapy; T cell expansion; T cell persistence; HER2-positive tumors; CD4+; CD8+

类别

资金

  1. OTKA (National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary) [K119690, FK132773]
  2. European Union [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00044, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00050]
  3. European Regional Development Fund [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00044, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00050]
  4. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  5. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology [UNKP-20-5-DE-48]
  6. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund [UNKP-20-3-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown that CAR T cell products with the highest proportion of effector cells and maintaining a good balance of CD4+/CD8+ cells are the most effective against solid tumors targeting HER2, both in vitro and in vivo. The differentiation status of CAR T cell products can affect their antitumor activity, with the most differentiated products showing greater target-specific cytolytic activity and antitumor efficacy. It is crucial to optimize CAR T cell production, as optimal product characteristics may vary depending on the targeted antigen and cancer type.
Simple Summary Adoptively transferred T cells expressing recombinant chimeric antigen receptors (CAR T cells) have been approved for the therapy of hematological malignancies of the B cell lineage. However, CAR T cell therapy for patients with solid tumors so far has shown limited benefits. Correlative clinical studies of patients with hematological malignancies have suggested that less differentiated CAR T cells have improved anti-leukemic activity. We have therefore investigated the role of differentiation on the anti-tumor activity of CAR T cells targeting the solid tumor antigen HER2 in preclinical models. We utilized different activation/expansion protocols, and explored whether different co-stimulatory domains in the CAR construct influence the short- and long-term efficacy of HER2-CAR T cells. We demonstrate that the CAR T cell product with the highest proportion of effector cells and maintaining a good balance of CD4+/CD8+ cells is the most effective against solid tumors both in vitro and in vivo. Correlative clinical studies of hematological malignancies have implicated that less differentiated, CD8+-dominant CAR T cell products have greater antitumor activity. Here, we have investigated whether the differentiation status of CAR T cell products affects their antitumor activity in preclinical models of solid tumors. We explored if different activation/expansion protocols, as well as different co-stimulatory domains in the CAR construct, influence the short- and long-term efficacy of CAR T cells against HER2-positive tumors. We generated T cell products that range from the most differentiated (CD28.z; OKT3-antiCD28/RPMI expansion) to the least differentiated (41BB.z; OKT3-RetroNectin/LymphoONE expansion), as judged by cell surface expression of the differentiation markers CCR7 and CD45RA. While the effect of differentiation status was variable with regard to antigen-specific cytokine production, the most differentiated CD28.z CAR T cell products, which were enriched in effector memory T cells, had the greatest target-specific cytolytic activity in vitro. These products also had a greater proliferative capacity and maintained CD4+ T cells upon repeated stimulation in vitro. In vivo, differentiated CD28.z CAR T cells also had the greatest antitumor activity, resulting in complete response. Our results highlight that it is critical to optimize CAR T cell production and that optimal product characteristics might depend on the targeted antigen and/or cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据