4.6 Article

Cetuximab Rechallenge Plus Avelumab in Pretreated Patients With RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer The Phase 2 Single-Arm Clinical CAVE Trial

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 1529-1535

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2915

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Merck
  2. Regione Campania [Cup 21C17000030007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that cetuximab plus avelumab is an effective and well-tolerated rechallenge therapy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Plasma ctDNA analysis may help in selecting patients who could benefit from this treatment.
IMPORTANCE Rechallenge therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs has been suggested in patients with chemo-refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after initial response to anti-EGFR-based first-line treatment. The association of treatment with cetuximab plus avelumab with overall survival (OS) may be worthy of investigation in this setting. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab rechallenge therapy plus avelumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial enrolled patients from August 2018 to February 2020. Eligible patients with RAS WT mCRC had a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR drugs, developed acquired resistance, and failed second-line therapy. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R mutation analysis was done. INTERVENTIONS Patients received avelumab (10mg/kg every 2 weeks) and cetuximab (400mg/m(2) and, subsequently, 250mg/m(2) weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas OS. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were enrolled (42 men, 35 women; median age, 63 years); 71 had microsatellite stable tumors (MSS), 3 microsatellite instability-high tumors (MSI-H), 3 unknown. The study met the primary end point, with median OS (mOS) of 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.8 months). Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.1 months). Common grade-3 adverse events were cutaneous eruption, 11 (14%), and diarrhea, 3 (4%). For 67 of 77 (87%) patients, baseline analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R variations was feasible. Forty-eight patients hadWT disease, whereas 19 had mutations. Patients with RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA had mOS of 17.3 months (95% CI, 12.5-22.0 months) compared with 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.90; P =.02). The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.2 months) in RAS/BRAF WT patients compared with 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6-3.5 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; P =.004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this single-arm phase 2 trial suggest that cetuximab plus avelumab is an active, well tolerated rechallenge therapy in RAS WT mCRC. Plasma ctDNA analysis before treatment may allow selection of patients who could benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据