4.1 Article

Commissioning of the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source II electron source

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.073401

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The LCLS-II project at SLAC is constructing a 1.3 GHz superconducting rf (SRF) linac to generate 4 GeV electron bunches at a high repetition rate for x-ray free electron lasers. The electron source includes the first three meters of the electron injector, comprising two normal-conducting, continuous-wave rf cavities designed and built by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory based on their advanced photoinjector experiment program. Installation of the source was completed in mid-2018, ahead of the SRF linac, and commissioning over a two-year period has resulted in characterization of electron beam and dark current.
For the Linac Coherent Light Source II (LCLS-II) project at SLAC, a 1.3 GHz superconducting rf (SRF) linac is being constructed that will generate 4 GeV electron bunches at a high repetition rate to drive x-ray free electron lasers. The LCLS-II electron source, which comprises the first three meters of the electron injector, includes two normal-conducting, continuous-wave rf cavities: a one-cell, 185.7 MHz gun and a two-cell, 1.3 GHz buncher. It also includes a gun load-lock system that allows photocathodes to be changed under vacuum. The components in this beam-line section were designed and built by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory based on experience from their advanced photoinjector experiment program. In combination with the SLAC UV laser system, the electron source is designed to produce beam rates up to 1 MHz with average currents up to 30 mu A initially. The source was installed in mid-2018, well in advance of the SRF linac, which is now nearing completion. The source was commissioned over a two-year period, and this paper presents results including electron beam and dark current characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据