4.7 Article

Variable relationship between accumulation and temperature in West Antarctica for the past 31,000 years

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 3795-3803

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016GL068356

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0944197, 0944191, 1043518]
  2. NASA ESS Fellowship
  3. WAIS Divide Science Coordination Office
  4. Ice Drilling Design and Operations
  5. National Ice Core Laboratory
  6. Antarctic Support Contractor
  7. 109th New York Air National Guard
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Division Of Polar Programs [0944191] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1043092] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [0944197] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Antarctic contribution to sea level is a balance between ice loss along the margin and accumulation in the interior. Accumulation records for the past few decades are noisy and show inconsistent relationships with temperature. We investigate the relationship between accumulation and temperature for the past 31 ka using high-resolution records from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) Divide ice core in West Antarctica. Although the glacial-interglacial increases result in high correlation and moderate sensitivity for the full record, the relationship shows considerable variability through time with high correlation and high sensitivity for the 0-8 ka period but no correlation for the 8-15 ka period. This contrasts with a general circulation model simulation which shows homogeneous sensitivities between temperature and accumulation across the entire time period. These results suggest that variations in atmospheric circulation are an important driver of Antarctic accumulation but they are not adequately captured in model simulations. Model-based projections of future Antarctic accumulation, and its impact on sea level, should be treated with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据