4.7 Article

Uncertainty and Bias in Global to Regional Scale Assessments of Current and Future Coastal Flood Risk

期刊

EARTHS FUTURE
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020EF001882

关键词

coastal flooding; sea-level rise; extreme events; uncertainty; storm surge; waves

资金

  1. ERA4CS Project INSeaPTION [01LS1703A]
  2. Project ISIPEDIA [01LS1711C]
  3. FORMAS
  4. BMBF
  5. BMWFW
  6. IFD
  7. MINECO
  8. ANR
  9. European Union [690462]
  10. PROTECT project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [869304]
  11. COACCH project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [776479]
  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)through the SEASCAPE II project, Special Priority Program 1889 Regional Sea Level Change and Society
  13. MOCCA project [RTI2018-093941-B-C31]
  14. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under the New (Early Career) Investigator Program in Earth Science [80NSSC18K0743]
  15. Australian Government National Environmental Science Program Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub
  16. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [016.161.324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a comparative assessment of uncertainties and biases in global to world-regional scale assessments of coastal flood risks, identifying human adaptation as the largest bias contributing to potential overestimation of coastal flood risk in 2100. Even with adaptation considered, uncertainties in how societies will respond to sea-level rise dominate all other uncertainties. Quantified global uncertainties include socio-economic development, digital elevation data, ice sheet models, and greenhouse gas emissions.
This study provides a literature-based comparative assessment of uncertainties and biases in global to world-regional scale assessments of current and future coastal flood risks, considering mean and extreme sea-level hazards, the propagation of these into the floodplain, people and coastal assets exposed, and their vulnerability. Globally, by far the largest bias is introduced by not considering human adaptation, which can lead to an overestimation of coastal flood risk in 2100 by up to factor 1300. But even when considering adaptation, uncertainties in how coastal societies will adapt to sea-level rise dominate with a factor of up to 27 all other uncertainties. Other large uncertainties that have been quantified globally are associated with socio-economic development (factors 2.3-5.8), digital elevation data (factors 1.2-3.8), ice sheet models (factor 1.6-3.8) and greenhouse gas emissions (factors 1.6-2.1). Local uncertainties that stand out but have not been quantified globally, relate to depth-damage functions, defense failure mechanisms, surge and wave heights in areas affected by tropical cyclones (in particular for large return periods), as well as nearshore interactions between mean sea-levels, storm surges, tides and waves. Advancing the state-of-the-art requires analyzing and reporting more comprehensively on underlying uncertainties, including those in data, methods and adaptation scenarios. Epistemic uncertainties in digital elevation, coastal protection levels and depth-damage functions would be best reduced through open community-based efforts, in which many scholars work together in collecting and validating these data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据