4.6 Article

Targeted inhibition of the deubiquitinating enzymes, USP14 and UCHL5, induces proteotoxic stress and apoptosis in Waldenstroom macroglobulinaemia tumour cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 169, 期 3, 页码 377-390

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13304

关键词

proteasome; deubiquitinase enzymes; Waldenstroms macroglobulinaemia; transcriptome; preclinical

资金

  1. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  2. Daniel Foundation of Alabama
  3. University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Developmental Research program [P50 CA097274]
  4. Predolin Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deubiquitinase enzymes (DUBs) of the proteasomal 19S regulatory particle are emerging as important therapeutic targets in several malignancies. Here we demonstrate that inhibition of two proteasome-associated DUBs (USP14 and UCHL5) with the small molecule DUB inhibitor b-AP15, results in apoptosis of human Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia (WM) cell lines and primary patient-derived WM tumour cells. Importantly, b-AP15 produced proteotoxic stress and apoptosis in WM cells that have acquired resistance to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. In silico modelling identified protein residues that were critical for the binding of b-AP15 with USP14 or UCHL5 and proteasome enzyme activity assays confirmed that b-AP15 does not affect the proteolytic capabilities of the 20S proteasome -subunits. In vitro toxicity from b-AP15 appeared to result from a build-up of ubiquitinated proteins and activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in WM cells, an effect that also disrupted the mitochondria. Focused transcriptome profiling of b-AP15-treated WM cells revealed modulation of several genes regulating cell stress and NF-B signalling, the latter whose protein translocation and downstream target activation was reduced by b-AP15 in vitro. This is the first report to define the effects and underlying mechanisms associated with inhibition of USP14 and UCHL5 DUB activity in WM tumour cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据