4.6 Review

Infant and Child MRI: A Review of Scanning Procedures

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.666020

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; infant; child; neuroimaging; brain

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation
  4. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  5. Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, State Grants for Clinical Research (ERVA)
  6. Alfred Kordelin Foundation
  7. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  8. Turku University Foundation
  9. Orion Research Foundation
  10. Juho Vainio Foundation
  11. Brain and Behavioral Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MRI is a safe method to examine the human brain, but motion sensitivity makes it challenging for pediatric scans. Proper preparation and techniques are crucial for successful scanning, and more detailed reporting is recommended to identify factors affecting scanning success.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a safe method to examine human brain. However, a typical MR scan is very sensitive to motion, and it requires the subject to lie still during the acquisition, which is a major challenge for pediatric scans. Consequently, in a clinical setting, sedation or general anesthesia is often used. In the research setting including healthy subjects anesthetics are not recommended for ethical reasons and potential longer-term harm. Here we review the methods used to prepare a child for an MRI scan, but also on the techniques and tools used during the scanning to enable a successful scan. Additionally, we critically evaluate how studies have reported the scanning procedure and success of scanning. We searched articles based on special subject headings from PubMed and identified 86 studies using brain MRI in healthy subjects between 0 and 6 years of age. Scan preparations expectedly depended on subject's age; infants and young children were scanned asleep after feeding and swaddling and older children were scanned awake. Comparing the efficiency of different procedures was difficult because of the heterogeneous reporting of the used methods and the success rates. Based on this review, we recommend more detailed reporting of scanning procedure to help find out which are the factors affecting the success of scanning. In the long term, this could help the research field to get high quality data, but also the clinical field to reduce the use of anesthetics. Finally, we introduce the protocol used in scanning 2 to 5-week-old infants in the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, and tips for calming neonates during the scans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据