4.5 Review

Recent Progress in the Fabrication and Characteristics of Self-Repairing Superhydrophobic Surfaces

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202100228

关键词

chemical component repair; physical structure repair; self-repairing surfaces; superhydrophobic surfaces

资金

  1. Northeast Petroleum University Youth Science Foundation [15011030810]
  2. Chemical Engineering and Technology Superiority Discipline Support Program of Northeast Petroleum University [15041260271]
  3. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51925403]
  4. Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [2019002]
  5. National Science Foundation of China [21676052, 21606042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent progress has been made in the development of superhydrophobic surfaces with self-repairing properties to address durability issues. These surfaces have advanced in terms of chemical component, physical structure, and combined repair, with applications described. However, critical limitations on self-repairing surfaces still exist, with discussions on future development.
Superhydrophobic surfaces show promise in a wide variety of potential applications that require self-cleaning, antifogging, anti-icing, anticorrosion, and antifouling properties. However, these surfaces often exhibit poor durability against physical or chemical damage, such as deep cut, ultraviolet irradiation, and oxygen plasma treatment. Superhydrophobic surfaces with self-repairing properties have been recently developed to overcome these durability issues. The recent progress in the fabrication and characteristics of self-repairing superhydrophobic surfaces, including chemical component, physical structure, and combined repair is summarized. The application of these superhydrophobic surfaces is also described. The critical limitations regarding self-repairing surfaces are highlighted and perspectives on future development are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据