4.6 Review

Unveiling the Sugary Secrets of Plasmodium Parasites

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712538

关键词

Plasmodium; glycans; glycobiology; glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI); O-glycans; N-glycans; malaria; glycocalyx; glycosaminoglycans; host defense

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RTG2046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malaria pathogenesis is closely linked to glycans on the surface of Plasmodium parasites and host cells, with complex glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) glycolipids playing a crucial role in parasite survival. Meanwhile, host cell glycocalyx and lectin expression serve as the first line of defense against parasites, directly impacting susceptibility to Plasmodium infection.
Plasmodium parasites cause malaria disease, one of the leading global health burdens for humanity, infecting hundreds of millions of people each year. Different glycans on the parasite and the host cell surface play significant roles in both malaria pathogenesis and host defense mechanisms. So far, only small, truncated N- and O-glycans have been identified in Plasmodium species. In contrast, complex glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) glycolipids are highly abundant on the parasite's cell membrane and are essential for its survival. Moreover, the parasites express lectins that bind and exploit the host cell surface glycans for different aspects of the parasite life cycle, such as adherence, invasion, and evasion of the host immune system. In parallel, the host cell glycocalyx and lectin expression serve as the first line of defense against Plasmodium parasites and directly dictate susceptibility to Plasmodium infection. This review provides an overview of the glycobiology involved in Plasmodium-host interactions and its contribution to malaria pathogenesis. Recent findings are presented and evaluated in the context of potential therapeutic exploitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据