4.7 Article

A Smartphone Intervention to Promote Time Restricted Eating Reduces Body Weight and Blood Pressure in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A Pilot Study

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13072148

关键词

meal timing; intermittent fasting; circadian rhythms; chrononutrition; time restricted eating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of time restricted eating (TRE) administered via a smartphone in adults with overweight and obesity. Participants successfully reduced their eating window and daily eating occasions, leading to decreases in body weight, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure.
The goal of this study was to test the feasibility of time restricted eating (TRE) in adults with overweight and obesity. Participants (n = 50) logged all eating occasions (>0 kcal) for a 2-week run-in period using a smartphone application. Participants with eating duration >= 14 h enrolled in an open label, non-randomized, prospective 90-day TRE intervention, with a self-selected reduced eating window of 10 h. No dietary counseling was provided. Changes in anthropometrics, eating patterns and adherence after TRE were analyzed using t-tests or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. The mean duration of the baseline eating window was 14 h 32 m +/- 2 h 36 m (n = 50) with 56% of participants with duration >= 14 h. TRE participants (n = 16) successfully decreased their eating window from 16 h 04 m +/- 1 h 24 m to 11 h 54 m +/- 2 h 06 m (p < 0.001), and reduced the number of daily eating occasions by half (p < 0.001). Adherence to logging and to the reduced eating window was 64% +/- 22% and 47% +/- 19%, respectively. TRE resulted in decreases in body weight (-2.1 +/- 3.0 kg, p = 0.017), waist circumference (-2.2 +/- 4.6 cm, p = 0.002) and systolic blood pressure (-12 +/- 11 mmHg, p = 0.002). This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of TRE administered via a smartphone, in adults with overweight and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据