4.7 Article

Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies That Target the Spike Receptor Binding Domain Confer Fc Receptor-Independent Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Syrian Hamsters

期刊

MBIO
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02395-21

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Syrian hamster; transmission; monoclonal antibodies

资金

  1. NIH [U01 AI151810, R01-AI139251, AI151810-01, R01-AI118938]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, USA [AI151810-01, T11-712/19-N]
  3. Research Grants Council
  4. HMRF Commissioned study [COVID190126]
  5. Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR, China
  6. NIAID [U01AI141990, U01AI150747]
  7. NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research [HHSN272201400006C, HHSN272201400008C]
  8. NIAID Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers [75N93019C00051]
  9. GreenLight Biosciences Inc.
  10. AbbVie Inc.
  11. AbbVie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that antibodies with ultrapotent neutralizing activity can effectively protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, while weakly neutralizing antibodies may also play a role in protection. Additionally, Fc receptor interactions are not involved in the prophylactic treatment effects.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein is the main target for neutralizing antibodies. These antibodies can be elicited through immunization or passively transferred as therapeutics in the form of convalescent-phase sera or monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Potently neutralizing antibodies are expected to confer protection; however, it is unclear whether weakly neutralizing antibodies contribute to protection. Also, their mechanism of action in vivo is incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that 2B04, an antibody with an ultrapotent neutralizing activity (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.04 mu g/ml), protects hamsters against SARS-CoV-2 in a prophylactic and therapeutic infection model. Protection is associated with reduced weight loss and viral loads in nasal turbinates and lungs after challenge. MAb 2B04 also blocked aerosol transmission of the virus to naive contacts. We next examined three additional MAbs (2C02, 2C03, and 2E06), recognizing distinct epitopes within the receptor binding domain of spike protein that possess either minimal (2C02 and 2E06, IC50 > 20 mu g/ml) or weak (2C03, IC50 of 5 mu g/ml) virus neutralization capacity in vitro. Only 2C03 protected Syrian hamsters from weight loss and reduced lung viral load after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we demonstrated that Fc-Fc receptor interactions were not required for protection when 2B04 and 2C03 were administered prophylactically. These findings inform the mechanism of protection and support the rational development of antibody-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections. IMPORTANCE The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in the loss of millions of lives. Safe and effective vaccines are considered the ultimate remedy for the global social and economic disruption caused by the pandemic. However, a thorough understanding of the immune correlates of protection against this virus is lacking. Here, we characterized four different monoclonal antibodies and evaluated their ability to prevent or treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in Syrian hamsters. These antibodies varied in their ability to neutralize the virus in vitro. Prophylactic administration of potent and weakly neutralizing antibodies protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and this effect was Fc receptor independent. The potent neutralizing antibody also had therapeutic efficacy and eliminated onward aerosol transmission. In contrast, minimally neutralizing antibodies provided no protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 in Syrian hamsters. Combined, these studies highlight the significance of weakly neutralizing antibodies in the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据