4.6 Review

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide in Learning and Memory

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.663418

关键词

PACAP; learning; working memory; fear; anxiety; cognition; sex; PTSD

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R15MH118601, F32MH122092]
  2. Charles E. Kubly Mental Health Center at Marquette University
  3. Marquette University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PACAP, a highly conserved neuropeptide, regulates neuronal physiology and transcription, plays a role in stress regulation, affective processing, neuroprotection, and cognition. Elevated PACAP levels and genetic disruption of PAC1 receptor signaling have been linked to maladaptive threat learning and pathological stress and fear in PTSD. Further research is needed to elucidate PACAP's contribution to adaptive and maladaptive fear learning.
Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a highly conserved neuropeptide that regulates neuronal physiology and transcription through Gs/Gq-coupled receptors. Its actions within hypothalamic, limbic, and mnemonic systems underlie its roles in stress regulation, affective processing, neuroprotection, and cognition. Recently, elevated PACAP levels and genetic disruption of PAC1 receptor signaling in humans has been linked to maladaptive threat learning and pathological stress and fear in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PACAP is positioned to integrate stress and memory in PTSD for which memory of the traumatic experience is central to the disorder. However, PACAP's role in memory has received comparatively less attention than its role in stress. In this review, we consider the evidence for PACAP-PAC1 receptor signaling in learning and plasticity, discuss emerging data on sex differences in PACAP signaling, and raise key questions for further study toward elucidating the contribution of PACAP to adaptive and maladaptive fear learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据