Assessing individual environmental exposure derived from the spatiotemporal behavior context and its impacts on mental health

Research on the associations between environmental exposures and mental health has attracted considerable attention. Most studies to date have mainly estimated environmental health effects based on static geographic contexts (e.g., residential neighborhoods, administrative units), ignoring the dynamic nature of individual spatiotemporal behavior, which may lead to unreliable results. To address this limitation, this study collects survey data from 1003 adults in Guangzhou, China. Then, it delineates dynamic geographic context to capture individual daily activity and travel and assesses individual exposure to environmental factors derived from the home buffer (HB) and the time-weighted activity and travel buffer (TATB). Finally, multiple linear regression models are used in this paper to examine and compare the relationships between individual environmental exposure and mental health based on the HB and TATB. The results of this study indicate that there are great differences in individual environmental exposure levels based on the HB and TATB. The explanatory power of the environmental factors obtained from the TATB on mental health is greater than that derived from the HB. Specifically, exposures to some environmental factors (i.e., green space coverage, blue space coverage, fitness facility density, and recreational facility density) derived from the TATB have mental health-promoting effects, while exposures to the other environmental factors (i.e., public transit station density) have mental health constraining effects. These findings enrich our knowledge of spatiotemporal behavior and the effects of the dynamic contextual environment on mental health, as well as provide valuable implications for urban planning and public health service.

Automated summary

Research on the associations between environmental exposures and mental health has shown that dynamic environmental factors play a significant role in mental health. Factors such as green space coverage, blue space coverage, and facility density have positive effects on mental health, while factors like public transit station density may have negative effects. These findings provide valuable insights for urban planning and public health services.