4.6 Review

Environmental exposure during travel: A research review and suggestions forward

期刊

HEALTH & PLACE
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102584

关键词

Travel; Urban mobility; Environmental exposure; Dynamic exposure assessment; Environmental health; Urban sustainability

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund [UIA03240]
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation Science Workshop fund
  3. Amer Cultural Foundation, Finland
  4. University of Helsinki, Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current research on environmental exposure during travel is limited in knowledge and understanding, requiring more geographically balanced studies to fill empirical evidence gaps and link environmental exposures with health and wellbeing outcomes.
Daily travel through the urban fabric exposes urban dwellers to a range of environmental conditions that may have an impact on their health and wellbeing. Knowledge about exposures during travel, their associations with travel behavior, and their social and health outcomes are still limited. In our review, we aim to explain how the current environmental exposure research addresses the interactions between human and environmental systems during travel through their spatial, temporal and contextual dimensions. Based on the 104 selected studies, we identify significant recent advances in addressing the spatiotemporal dynamics of exposure during travel. However, the conceptual and methodological framework for understanding the role of multiple environmental exposures in travel environments is still in an early phase, and the health and wellbeing impacts at individual or population level are not well known. Further research with greater geographical balance is needed to fill the gaps in the empirical evidence, and linking environmental exposures during travel with the causal health and wellbeing outcomes. These advancements can enable evidence-based urban and transport planning to take the next step in advancing urban livability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据