4.2 Article

Honeybee intestines retain low yeast titers, but no bacterial mutualists, at emergence

期刊

YEAST
卷 39, 期 1-2, 页码 95-107

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3665

关键词

fungi; honeybee; microbiota; yeast

资金

  1. Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Research Associate Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that yeasts can survive and exist at relatively low levels throughout the development of bees, while known bacterial mutualists are generally not found in pre-eclosed adult bees. Whether yeasts are actively retained as an important part of the bee microbiota or passively propagating in the colony remains unknown.
Honeybee symbionts, predominantly bacteria, play important roles in honeybee health, nutrition, and pathogen protection, thereby supporting colony health. On the other hand, fungi are often considered indicators of poor bee health, and honeybee microbiome studies generally exclude fungi and yeasts. We hypothesized that yeasts may be an important aspect of early honeybee biology, and if yeasts provide a mutual benefit to their hosts, then honeybees could provide a refuge during metamorphosis to ensure the presence of yeasts at emergence. We surveyed for yeast and fungi during pupal development and metamorphosis in worker bees using fungal-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), next-generation sequencing, and standard microbiological culturing. On the basis of yeast presence in three distinct apiaries and multiple developmental stages, we conclude that yeasts can survive through metamorphosis and in naive worker bees, albeit at relatively low levels. In comparison, known bacterial mutualists, like Gilliamella and Snodgrassella, were generally not found in pre-eclosed adult bees. Whether yeasts are actively retained as an important part of the bee microbiota or are passively propagating in the colony remains unknown. Our demonstration of the constancy of yeasts throughout development provides a framework to further understand the honeybee microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据