Experimental Estimation of the Elastic Modulus of Concrete Girders from Drive-By Inspections with Force-Balance Accelerometers

Parametric identification of bridges using instrumented vehicles can be challenging, mainly due to the reduced length of the time series associated with the bridge span under test. This research discusses the practicability of a time-domain identification method based on the use of an instrumented vehicle. The highest cross-correlation between the bridge response from an elementary analytical model and the experimental one, acquired by a moving force-balance accelerometer, yields the unknown model parameter. The effect of vehicle-bridge interaction is removed by proper filtering of the signals. Specifically, the authors estimate the elastic moduli of seven prestressed concrete bridges and compare a subset of the results to the outcomes of static load tests carried out on the same bridges. There is a good correlation between the elastic moduli from the instrumented vehicle and those from static load tests: the method grasps the approximate value of the elastic modulus of concrete. Still, the data do not return an excellent match due to the bias in the estimation of the deflection shape-the paper remarks on the issues faced during the experimental tests and proposes possible enhancements of these procedures.

Automated summary

This research discusses the practicability of a time-domain identification method based on the use of an instrumented vehicle for parametric identification of bridges. The study shows that there is a good correlation between the elastic moduli obtained from the instrumented vehicle and those from static load tests, but there may be bias in the estimation of the deflection shape during the experimental tests. The paper suggests possible enhancements of these procedures to improve the accuracy of the results.