4.6 Article

Use of Multiple Low Cost Carbon Dioxide Sensors to Measure Exhaled Breath Distribution with Face Mask Type and Wearing Behaviour

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21186204

关键词

face mask; CO2 sensors; COVID-19; data interpolation

资金

  1. [EP/P023312/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/P023312/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized low-cost wirelessly connected carbon dioxide sensors to analyze the impact of mask wearing on exhaled breath concentration. Findings suggest that while the type of mask used has minimal effect on CO2 concentration, improper mask wearing results in statistically significant differences in CO2 distribution.
The use of cloth face coverings and face masks has become widespread in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents a method of using low cost wirelessly connected carbon dioxide (CO2) sensors to measure the effects of properly and improperly worn face masks on the concentration distribution of exhaled breath around the face. Four types of face masks are used in two indoor environment scenarios. CO2 as a proxy for exhaled breath is being measured with the Sensirion SCD30 CO2 sensor, and data are being transferred wirelessly to a base station. The exhaled CO2 is measured in four directions at various distances from the head of the subject, and interpolated to create spatial heat maps of CO2 concentration. Statistical analysis using the Friedman's analysis of variance (ANOVA) test is carried out to determine the validity of the null hypotheses (i.e., distribution of the CO2 is same) between different experiment conditions. Results suggest CO2 concentrations vary little with the type of mask used; however, improper use of the face mask results in statistically different CO2 spatial distribution of concentration. The use of low cost sensors with a visual interpolation tool could provide an effective method of demonstrating the importance of proper mask wearing to the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据