4.7 Review

Kinship dynamics: patterns and consequences of changes in local relatedness

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1129

关键词

kin selection; cooperation; conflict; life history; demography

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council [NE/S010327/1]
  2. Leverhulme early career research fellowship
  3. NERC [NE/S010327/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the importance of kinship dynamics and their impact on social behavior and life history evolution, highlighting new insights brought by the kinship dynamics approach in behavior and life history evolution, and exploring new research directions that analyzing kinship dynamics could provide.
Mounting evidence suggests that patterns of local relatedness can change over time in predictable ways, a process termed kinship dynamics. Kinship dynamics may occur at the level of the population or social group, where the mean relatedness across all members of the population or group changes over time, or at the level of the individual, where an individual's relatedness to its local group changes with age. Kinship dynamics are likely to have fundamental consequences for the evolution of social behaviour and life history because they alter the inclusive fitness payoffs to actions taken at different points in time. For instance, growing evidence suggests that individual kinship dynamics have shaped the evolution of menopause and age-specific patterns of helping and harming. To date, however, the consequences of kinship dynamics for social evolution have not been widely explored. Here we review the patterns of kinship dynamics that can occur in natural populations and highlight how taking a kinship dynamics approach has yielded new insights into behaviour and life-history evolution. We discuss areas where analysing kinship dynamics could provide new insight into social evolution, and we outline some of the challenges in predicting and quantifying kinship dynamics in natural populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据