4.8 Article

DNAse-dependent, NET-independent pathway of thrombus formation in vivo

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100561118

关键词

thrombosis; NETs; neutrophil; adenosine; intravital microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research indicates that neutrophils rather than NETs are involved in thrombus formation after laser-induced injury. Treatment with DNase-I leads to hydrolysis of ATP and ADP, generating adenosine and inhibiting thrombus formation in vivo.
The contribution of NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps) to thrombus formation has been intensively documented in both arterial and venous thrombosis in mice. We previously demonstrated that adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-activated neutrophils play a key role in initiating the tissue factor-dependent activation of the coagulation cascade, leading to thrombus formation following laser-induced injury. Here, we investigated the contribution of NETs to thrombus formation in a laser-induced injury model. In vivo, treatment of mice with DNase-I significantly inhibited the accumulation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils at the site of injury, neutrophil elastase secretion, and platelet thrombus formation within seconds following injury. Surprisingly, electron microscopy of the thrombus revealed that neutrophils present at the site of laser-induced injury did not form NETs. In vitro, ATP, the main neutrophil agonist present at the site of laser-induced injury, induced the overexpression of PAD4 and CitH3 but not NETosis. However, compared to no treatment, the addition of DNase-I was sufficient to cleave ATP and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in adenosine. Human and mouse platelet aggregation by ADP and neutrophil activation by ATP were also significantly reduced in the presence of DNase-I. We conclude that following laser-induced injury, neutrophils but not NETs are involved in thrombus formation. Treatment with DNase-I induces the hydrolysis of ATP and ADP, leading to the generation of adenosine and the inhibition of thrombus formation in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据