4.6 Article

Systemic inflammation is associated with the density of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer

期刊

GASTRIC CANCER
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 602-611

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0642-0

关键词

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; Prognostic nutritional index; Immune cell; Tumor microenvironment; Gastric cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are markers of systemic inflammation known to be useful prognostic indicators of malignancy. However, little evidence has defined the influence of inflammation on the tumor microenvironment. Two hundred eighty-eight patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer were included. Preoperative peripheral blood samples were used to analyze the NLR and PNI. The optimal cutoff levels for the NLR and PNI were defined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for survival (NLR = 2.7, PNI = 47.7). The densities of specific immune cells (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+)) within the tumor microenvironment were measured in tumor microarrays by immunohistochemical analysis. Two hundred thirty-five patients (81.6 %) had a low NLR and 53 patients (18.4 %) had a high NLR. One hundred seventeen patients (40.6 %) had a low PNI and 171 patients (59.4 %) had a high PNI. CD3(+) and CD8(+) immune cell density were not associated with the NLR and PNI. However, in the high-NLR group compared with the low-NLR group, CD4(+) immune cell density was significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Similarly, the density of CD4(+) immune cells was also significantly decreased in the low-PNI group compared with the high-PNI group (P = 0.007). A high NLR and a low PNI were correlated with worse overall survival in multivariate analysis (P = 0.028 and P = 0.002 respectively). The NLR and PNI are associated with the density of CD4(+) immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, which leads to prognostic values of systemic inflammation in gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据