4.5 Article

Quantitative analysis of mineral elements in hair and nails using calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

期刊

OPTIK
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167067

关键词

Calibration-free laser-induced breakdown; spectroscopy; Biomarkers; Mineral elements

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62075069, 62005078]
  2. Open Project Program of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics [2019WNLOKF010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human biomarkers such as hair and nails provide a continuous record of element concentration indicating nutritional status and metabolic changes. CF-LIBS assisted with the standard reference line method can be used to quantify the content ratio of elements in hair and nails, with relative errors less than 10% compared to ICPOES. This method shows promise as a tool for biomedicine.
Human biomarkers, such as hair and nails, often provide a continuous record of element concentration to indicate the nutritional status and metabolic changes. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), as a rapid detection method without sample preparation, provides a good alternative for measuring mineral elements in hair and nails. For biomedical applications of LIBS, high-precision and high-sensitivity instruments are commonly used in LIBS systems, such as Mechelle 5000 coupled with iStar ICCD. Their high cost limits the wide application of LIBS instruments. In this work, we used a low-cost autofocus LIBS system to obtain the spectral lines directly from hair and nails. The calibration-free LIBS (CF-LIBS) assisted with the standard reference line method was used to quantify the content ratio of Ca/Na and Mg/Na in hair and nails. The results showed that the relative errors between quantitative results of CF-LIBS and ICPOES were less than 10% in hair and nails, which verified the accuracy of this method. These results illustrated that CF-LIBS assisted with the standard reference line method is a promising tool for biomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据