4.7 Article

A statistical framework for non-negative matrix factorization based on generalized dual divergence

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 309-324

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.020

关键词

Nonnegative matrix factorization; Dual Kullback-Leibler divergence; beta-divergence; Unsupervised learning; Deep learning; Cancer genomics

资金

  1. NIH, United States of America [P30 CA06927]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A statistical framework for non-negative matrix factorization based on generalized dual Kullback-Leibler divergence is proposed, along with a family of algorithms developed within this framework. The convergence of the algorithms under sparsity constraints is proven using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm. This framework provides a useful alternative for non-negative matrix factorization with different noise structures and can be viewed from the perspective of reinforcement learning.
A statistical framework for non-negative matrix factorization based on generalized dual Kullback-Leibler divergence, which includes members of the exponential family of models, is proposed. A family of algorithms is developed using this framework, including under sparsity constraints, and its convergence proven using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm. The framework generalizes some existing methods for different noise structures and contrasts with the recently developed quasi-likelihood approach, thus providing a useful alternative for non-negative matrix factorization. A measure to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the resulting factorization is described. The performance of the proposed methods is evaluated extensively using real life and simulated data and their utility in unsupervised and semi-supervised learning is illustrated using an application in cancer genomics. This framework can be viewed from the perspective of reinforcement learning, and can be adapted to incorporate discriminant functions and multi-layered neural networks within a deep learning paradigm. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据