4.7 Article

Analysis and prediction of slag-induced corrosion of chromium oxide-free refractory materials during fusion of coal and biomass ash under simulated gasification conditions

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 218-230

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.04.022

关键词

Coal; Biomass; Gasification; Refractory corrosion; Mineral matter; Thermochemical modeling

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. RWE Generation AG
  3. Vattenfall Europe AG
  4. MIBRAG mbH
  5. ROMONTA AG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four chromium oxide-free refractories based on spinel, alumina, and calcium aluminatesare brought in contact with three ashes from coal and biomass with different base to acid ratios (B/A) and alkali contents under reducing atmosphere (simulated gasification). This investigation is performed in a lab-scale oven with a defined heat up to 1450 degrees C and a subsequent slow cool down to room temperature in H-2/Ar atmosphere over a period of 3-4 h. Afterwards sample sections are prepared and analyzed by optical microscopy and SEM/EDX. The slag infiltration pathways are identified and the formed mineral phases in the sections are localized by SEM/EDX mapping. A stepwise model of thermochemical calculations of the interacting species using the FactSageTm software package is applied to reproduce the slag progression inside of the different refractory materials and to predict the formed mineral phases by equilibrium state calculations. The corrosion mechanisms and corrosion depths are concluded from the comparison between experiment and thermochemical calculations. A comparably good agreement between both experiment and calculation is shown. Aim of the present study is the identification of promising candidates of environmentally friendly and cheap substitutes for the commercially used chromium oxide-based refractory materials as well as the development of related methodical approaches for the evaluation/prediction. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据