4.5 Article

Anti-angiogenic effect of mountain ginseng in vitro and in vivo: Comparison with farm-cultivated ginseng

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12254

关键词

angiogenesis; ginsenosides; mountain ginseng; SVEC4-10 cells; VEGF-R2

资金

  1. Standardization Project of Korean Medicine Acupuncture - Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare [3243-302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mountain ginseng ethanol extract (MGE) possesses stronger anti-angiogenic properties than farm-cultivated ginseng extract (FGE) by inhibiting the activation of the VEGF-R2 signaling pathway. This discovery may provide insights into the anticancer mechanism of MGE for cancer treatment.
Mountain ginseng (Panax ginseng) has been used for cancer patient therapy in Northeast Asia. Although it is well known that cancer cells are able to induce angiogenesis, the effect of mountain ginseng on angiogenesis is still unknown. In the present study, we investigated whether ethanolic extract of mountain ginseng (MGE) could inhibit angiogenesis in in vitro and in vivo models. In comparison with farm-cultivated ginseng extract (FGE), MGE more strongly inhibited cell migration and formation of capillary-like network within non-cytotoxic ranges in SVEC4-10 cells. In addition, MGE dose-dependently suppressed Transwell cell migration of the cells. Moreover, MGE reduced the phosphorylation and expression of VEGF-R2 as well as the phosphorylation of FAK, Src, Akt and ERK, the intermediate proteins in the VEGF-R2 signaling cascade, in the cells. As expected, MGE dramatically decreased hemoglobin content in Matrigel plugs in mice. In conclusion, MGE possesses stronger anti-angiogenic properties than FGE in vascular endothelial cells. Such effect of MGE is correlated with inhibition of activation of the VEGF-R2 signaling pathway. Therefore, the novel features of MGE may be helpful for understanding its anticancer mechanism for the treatment of cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据