4.8 Article

Rational Approach to Plasmonic Dimers with Controlled Gap Distance, Symmetry, and Capability of Precisely Hosting Guest Molecules in Hotspot Regions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 23, 页码 8631-8638

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c13377

关键词

-

资金

  1. MOST [2017YFA0204501, 2013CB834502]
  2. NSFC [21773135, 22032003, 21821001]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [TRR61]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strategy demonstrated in the study allows for the construction of cage-bridged plasmonic dimers with controlled sizes, compositions, shape, symmetry, and interparticle gap separation. This approach offers a high degree of freedom and controllability, facilitating the creation of various symmetrical/asymmetrical dimers with sub-5 nm gap distance and tailored optical properties.
Plasmonic dimers not only provide a unique platform for studying fundamental plasmonic behavior and effects but also are functional materials for numerous applications. The efficient creation of well-defined dimers with flexible control of structure parameters and thus tunable optical property is the prerequisite for fully exploiting the potential of this nanostructure. Herein, based on a polymer-assisted self-assembly approach in conjugation with molecular cage chemistry, a strategy was demonstrated for constructing cage-bridged plasmonic dimers with controlled sizes, compositions, shape, symmetry, and interparticle gap separation in a modular and high-yield manner. With a high degree of freedom and controllability, this strategy allows facilely accessing various symmetrical/asymmetrical dimers with sub-5 nm gap distance and tailored optical properties. Importantly, as the linkage of the two constituent elements, the molecular cages embedded in the junction endow the assembled dimers with the ability to precisely and reversibly host rich guest molecules in hotspot regions, offering great potential for creating various plasmon-mediated applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据