4.4 Article

DROPSTONE DEPOSITION: RESULTS OF NUMERICAL PROCESS MODELING OF DEFORMATION STRUCTURES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER DEPTH IN SHALLOW LACUSTRINE AND MARINE SUCCESSIONS

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 507-519

出版社

SEPM-SOC SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2020.111

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Science Center (Poland) [2015/19/B/ST10/00661, 2019/33/N/ST10/00095]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dropstones in lacustrine and marine sediments vary in size, affecting their settling velocity and impact depth. Environmental factors and unknown material properties of bottom sediments play crucial roles in dropstone imprint formation during deposition.
Dropstones in lacustrine and marine sediments show a wide range of sizes: from less than a millimeter to many meters. Their size and shape determine the velocity and the acceleration when they settle through the water column, and this, in turn, determines in principle the imprint that they make in the bottom sediment. Although these parameters are crucial for dropstone deposition, the unknown material (sediment) properties (like strength, porosity, pore-water content, viscosity, etc.) of the bottom sediment play a just as important role in this process as the water depth, which can physically be understood as the length of the pathway traveled vertically through a dense medium before the impact. Reconstruction of the principal environmental conditions at the time of dropstone fall and deposition consequently requires considering the variety of factors affecting the final imprint depth of a dropstone, the combination of several numerical methods. Here, we show the results of numerical modeling of dropstones with different sizes that settle through water columns with different depths. Our results show how environmental factors control the deformation structures formed at the sedimentary surface during the impact of a dropstone, and how deep the imprint caused by the settling dropstone will be.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据