4.7 Article

Regulation of Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Cortex by the Activity of the Cortical Network

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 41, 期 27, 页码 5779-5790

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0434-21.2021

关键词

cerebral cortex; critical period plasticity; extracellular matrix; fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons; peri-neuronal net

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR15CE160010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of parvalbumin-expressing (PV) interneurons in adult mice can induce perineuronal net (PNN) regression, while activation of these neurons does not reduce PNN density. The density of PNN in the adult cortex is regulated by local changes in network activity, which can be triggered through modulation of PV interneurons.
Perineuronal net (PNN) accumulation around parvalbumin-expressing (PV) inhibitory interneurons marks the closure of critical periods of high plasticity, whereas PNN removal reinstates juvenile plasticity in the adult cortex. Using targeted chemogenetic in vivo approaches in the adult mouse visual cortex, we found that transient inhibition of PV interneurons, through metabotropic or ionotropic chemogenetic tools, induced PNN regression. EEG recordings indicated that inhibition of PV interneurons did not elicit unbalanced network excitation. Likewise, inhibition of local excitatory neurons also induced PNN regression, whereas chemogenetic excitation of either PV or excitatory neurons did not reduce the PNN. We also observed that chemogenetically inhibited PV interneurons exhibited reduced PNN compared with their untransduced neighbors, and confirmed that single PV interneurons express multiple genes enabling individual regulation of their own PNN density. Our results indicate that PNN density is regulated in the adult cortex by local changes of network activity that can be triggered by modulation of PV interneurons. PNN regulation may provide adult cortical circuits with an activity-dependent mechanism to control their local remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据